any in the Enlightenment were unsatisfied with existing doctrines in political philosophy, which seemed to marginalize or neglect the possibility of a democratic state.Jean-Jacques Ruosseau was among those who attempted to overturn these doctrines: he responded to Hobbes by claiming that a human is by nature a kind of "novle savage", and that society and social contracts corrupt this nature. Another critic was John Locke. In second treatise on movement he agreed with Hobbes that the nation-state was an efficient tool for raising humanity out of a deplorable state, but he argued that the sovereign might become an abominable institution compared to the relatively benign unmodulated state of nature.
Following the doctrine of the fact-value distinction, due in part to the influence of david hume and his student Adam Smith , appeals to human nature for political justification were weakened. Nevertheless, many political philosophers, especially moral realistits , still make use of some essential human nature as a basis for their arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment